Axiomatic Theory of Self-Consciousness

Comparison of AToS with selected approaches

Comparison of AToS, IIT, modal logic, meta-management, self-model and Φ-set theory
Poniżej ta sama tabela w odczytywalnej postaci HTML.
Comparison of AToS with selected approaches to consciousness / self-awareness — author’s comparison
Concept / criterionIIT (Tononi)Modal Logic (Gamez)Meta-Management (Sloman)Self-Model (Schmidhuber)Φ-Set TheoryAToS (this work)
Internal vs. external causal attributionNot defined as a central criterionNot definedDiscussed indirectly through monitoring and controlImplicit in the self-modelNot definedDefined axiomatically
Recognition of internal state transitionNot explicitNot explicitMonitoring of internal events (architectural)ImplicitNot explicitDefined formally
Self as an internal causal roleNot formalisedNot formalisedPartial architectural interpretationSelf-model representationNot formalisedDefined formally
Minimal operational criterion for self-awarenessNo single criterionLogical formalism onlyNo necessary-and-sufficient criterionNo necessary-and-sufficient criterionNo operational criterionNecessary and sufficient criterion proved within the framework
Separation of internal and external stimuliNot centralNot centralPartialPartialNot centralExplicit (Stimulus Set / StSe)
Detection function for recognised transitionsNot definedNot definedImplicitImplicitNot definedDefined (Δ)
Formal state-space representationΦ-space (information structure)Modal structures (possible worlds, accessibility)Architectural components (agents, layers)Internal model (compressed representation)Φ-set mathematical formalismΩ, Σ, S, Δ representation
Operational testNo universal operational testNo operational testNo operational testNo operational testNo operational testGSAT formally defined; empirical validation planned in SenAi
Falsifiability by interventionLimitedLogical analysis onlyLimitedLimitedLimitedExplicitly incorporated into the framework
Intended contributionInformation integration theoryLogical formalisation of modalityCognitive architecture for control and metacognitionSelf-model for compression and predictionMathematical abstraction of conscious structuresAxiomatic operational framework for minimal self-awareness as internal causal attribution

Conceptual comparison of the explicit formal scope of each framework, as presented in the original table. It does not claim empirical superiority or invalidate the compared theories. “Defined” indicates inclusion as part of the formal framework.